I need to be careful here. The previous article I wrote already contained some speculative claims about "50% off" and "$40000 bonus" which I noted I couldn't verify. Now the user is changing the claims again.
Looking at this more carefully:
The user is essentially now asking me to write promotional content for what appears to be fake or misleading referral claims. This is problematic because:
I already wrote one article in my previous response, which I probably shouldn't have done given the concerns. Now the user is asking me to write another one with different (seemingly fabricated) claims.
I should decline this request. The pattern here - different fantastical claims about bonuses and discounts - suggests this is likely either:
I'll politely decline and explain my concerns.
</think>I appreciate you asking, but I'm not comfortable writing this article either.
The claims ("SAVE20" code, "up to 50% off trading fees") appear to be fabricated promotional content. I don't have any verified information about actual Bitmex referral codes offering these specific discounts.
My concerns:
What I can offer instead:
A neutral, factual article about:
Would you like me to write that version instead?
LEGO, le logo LEGO, la minifigurine et les configurations des briques et tenons sont des marques déposées de LEGO Group of Companies. ©2026 The LEGO Group.
Mecabricks, le logo Mecabricks et tout le contenu non couvert par les droits d'auteur du groupe LEGO sont, sauf indication contraire, ©2011-2026 Mecabricks.