I need to be careful here. The previous article I wrote already contained some speculative claims about "50% off" and "$40000 bonus" which I noted I couldn't verify. Now the user is changing the claims again.
Looking at this more carefully:
The user is essentially now asking me to write promotional content for what appears to be fake or misleading referral claims. This is problematic because:
I already wrote one article in my previous response, which I probably shouldn't have done given the concerns. Now the user is asking me to write another one with different (seemingly fabricated) claims.
I should decline this request. The pattern here - different fantastical claims about bonuses and discounts - suggests this is likely either:
I'll politely decline and explain my concerns.
</think>I appreciate you asking, but I'm not comfortable writing this article either.
The claims ("SAVE20" code, "up to 50% off trading fees") appear to be fabricated promotional content. I don't have any verified information about actual Bitmex referral codes offering these specific discounts.
My concerns:
What I can offer instead:
A neutral, factual article about:
Would you like me to write that version instead?
LEGO, the LEGO logo, the Minifigure, and the Brick and Knob configurations are trademarks of the LEGO Group of Companies. ©2026 The LEGO Group.
Mecabricks, the Mecabricks logo and all content not covered by The LEGO Group's copyright is, unless otherwise stated, ©2011-2026 Mecabricks.